Yea or Nay: Bitten by Sarah Jessica Parker at Steve Barry- I’ve Got Pictures | The Budget Fashionista Yea or Nay: Bitten by Sarah Jessica Parker at Steve Barry- I've Got Pictures | Budget Fashion, Womens Fashion Expert, Advice, Trends for REAL Women | The Budget Fashionista
Also from Simply Good Media:  Men  Green  Home  Travel  Kids
Yea or Nay: Bitten by Sarah Jessica Parker at Steve Barry- I’ve Got Pictures
March 26, 2007 09:06 AM

UPDATE: Read about Bitten by Sarah Jessica Parker on Oprah

UPDATE: I decided to REMOVE the photos. Click Here to Learn Why.

UPDATE: Steve & Barry’s Lawyers just sent me an a letter. Post Your thoughts on whether I should take these photos down or leave them up. I will make a decision, based on you comments by Thursday 12 noon.

UPDATE: According to WWD, everything is moving forward with the line. The issue was that Oprah was promised an exclusive and they wanted long lead magazines (who will only say glowing things about it) to have first dibs. Also, TBF was the FIRST to post anything about the line as a fashion blind item over a month before any of the other sites got word of it. I only held onto to it because I was asked to (which now I realized I should have just published it in full for you guys on February 8th.)

A few weeks ago, I broke the news that Sarah Jessica Parker (aka “Carrie” from the HBO TV show ‘Sex and The City’) was designing a line called “Bitten” for discount sportswear retailer Steve and Barry’s as a fashion blind item during fashion week. First let me say, I REALLY want to like this line and will save my full assessment when it appears in stores. However, based on the pictures below, I must say that the Bitten line looks pretty uneventful, in fact, it looks a lot like the stuff she was hawking for the GAP (and we all know what has happen to the Gap). 

Again, I WANT to like this line. I really do.  However, most of the people who shop at Steve & Barry’, a store I happen to like and shop at, are at the fashion 101 level, while this line seems to be more fashion 201. It has none of the easy urban style of Madonna’s line at H&M and none of the creative basic look of Isaac Mizrahi at Target.  I am also pretty skeptical of the overly touched up pictures (usually sign of poor quality garments).

That being said, the Bitten line does feature cute basics (wide leg khaki trousers, basic black tops, a collection of black dresses, accessories etc.) all priced under $19.95. However, when I think of Sarah Jessica Parker, I don’t think of basics.. I think of quirky style, interesting patterns, strange mixtures, etc. I’m not sure if this line will feature these elements of her “public” personal style.

Which makes me ask this question… Is SJP’s style really her own style or that of a good stylist (hello Patricia Fields)?

Now that you’ve seen the pictures....  Bitten by Sarah Jessica Parker: Yea or Nay?

Click Below For More Pictures From Bitten by Sarah Jessica Parker

Target.com

Wal-Mart

Comments

March 26, 2007 Betty wrote:
No Avatar Available

Bitten, IS SOOOOOOOOOOOO Bad. Sarah yoou know these clothes are UGLY and you know that you will not wear them so get out now and do not try this again. Stick to what you do best.

Comments

March 26, 2007 Erica wrote:
No Avatar Available

The whole line looks ok but the peacock and camo outfit is just horrible. It looks like men?s clothing. Therefore by association I do not like any of these clothes. You are right about how everything looks like the Gap.

Comments

March 26, 2007 Christina wrote:
No Avatar Available

I saw on Styledash that they are actually delaying this line to redesign it because reaction to these photos was so bad.

Comments

March 26, 2007 Kari wrote:
No Avatar Available

It’s not really THAT bad, just incredibly boring. But what else can we expect from fashion these days...we’ve brought back Mod and have apparently forgotten why it went out of style in the first place. Most of the Mod looks do not flatter a woman’s body. Quite the opposite in fact. SJP doesn’t really have any creative room in today’s fashion market. And if it’s really her fabulous stylist, let’s start a petition to get Patricia Fields to start up an affordable line.

PS: Co-sign on the peacock and camo...are they serious about that?!!

Comments

March 26, 2007 Christianne wrote:
No Avatar Available

It just reminds me of anything I could buy at Old Navy. Blah, plain and not too exciting. I’ll go for khakis under $20 if they are well made.

We are getting a Steve and Barry’s next month, so that whole experience will be new to me.

Christianne

Comments

March 26, 2007 Latia wrote:
No Avatar Available

This reminds me of the stuff I buy a couple of times a month...for my 14 month old daughter (except for the whole peacock and camo bit). 
BOOOORRRINNNG!
I am so bored to death with fashion these days that I’ve really just quit going to department stores and have resulted to shopping at Target and Wal-Mart.
Seriously.
I found the cutest red polka dotted sundress and a bright YELLOW PATENT LEATHER bag at Target.
The dress was twelve bucks and the bag was 19.

Poo on companies slapping someone’s name on a line and thinking we’ll buy it.
If it’s ugly enough, I wouldn’t even LOOK at a line with someone’s name on it.
You can pay me a gazillion dollars to put my name on a line and make it the laziest and least efforted design ever.

Comments

March 26, 2007 Sempre Libera wrote:
No Avatar Available

Boring, boring, boring

Comments

March 26, 2007 Di wrote:
No Avatar Available

Nay. BIG nay. These are items that look great on SJP, but not on a real person with a normal body.

Comments

March 26, 2007 Dionne wrote:
No Avatar Available

Looks like the same ole same ole to me.  I would have loved to see some of the chic, quirky outfits that SJP wore in the first couple of seasons of Sex/City.

Comments

March 26, 2007 talley wrote:
No Avatar Available

i’m not going to throw out my entire wardrobe and only wear this stuff, but honestly, it’s not that bad.  yeah, it’s boring, but it’s basics.  i personally like basics, so i’m okay with it.  it’s cute.  =)

Comments

March 26, 2007 Cathy wrote:
No Avatar Available

Wow - those pictures DO look like they are from the GAP! And let’s just say that I haven’t been impressed with the GAP since about 1999.

Comments

March 26, 2007 coco wrote:
No Avatar Available

I do not know about this Steve & Barry place but I do know these clothes look lame and cheap!

Comments

March 26, 2007 Nancy B. wrote:
No Avatar Available

Those clothes are so dull.  There’s nothing special to them, nothing to separate them from anything else already out there.  I mean, it looks like the same sort of stuff you could get at the Gap, Target, JCPenney, wherever.  There is just no style to the line AT ALL (and what’s up with that jumper?  Can you say MOM CLOTHES???).

I am very disappointed.  I was hoping for clothes with at least some redeeming fashion value, something maybe even a little exciting, but instead we get stuff that most of us already have in our closets.  Bitten = Been There, Done That.

Comments

March 26, 2007 christal wrote:
No Avatar Available

I really like SJP’s style but this stuff looks a little lame.  Maybe you are right, she has a great stylist.

Comments

March 27, 2007 Maureen wrote:
Maureen's avatar

I said yay a few weeks ago in regard to SJP’s new line. But its not that impressive. I expected more from her than this. No go on the high low.

Comments

March 27, 2007 Anya wrote:
No Avatar Available

well all I’ve got to say is that camo pants are never a good thing unless your in the army. So what the hell is she thinking.

this line looks like its doing a real half assed job at being trendy, and completely failing at it. Basic, boring, whatever. At least it’s cheap.

Comments

March 27, 2007 Tina wrote:
No Avatar Available

http://www.fashionweekdaily.com/news/fullstory.sps?inewsid=410739&itype=8486

Comments

March 27, 2007 suz wrote:
No Avatar Available

They’re… clothes. Not great, not terrible. Good enough, probably.

I still don’t see how or why SJP is supposed to appeal to customers 20 years younger than she is. I know that we all want to see ourselves as young and hip as we get older, but in reality high school kids (and college kids etc) aren’t looking to anyone 40 years old as a fashion avatar.

Comments

March 27, 2007 TBF wrote:
No Avatar Available

Althought the daily would like to take credit- I revealed it on Feb 8th, four weeks BEFORE as a fashion blind item- http://www.thebudgetfashionista.com/archives/fashion_week_fall_2007/fashion_week_fa_12.php
and only held on to it because I was asked to do so by the powers that be.

and then reveled the actually name and details of the line several hours before Fashionweek daily, who wasn’t invited to the launch either, posted it.

No matter.. I still love the daily- just don’t claim to be something you’re not.

Also the info posted in the link above was lifted right from the Steve& Barry’s press release.

That being said.. I’m holding my full judgement off until

Comments

March 27, 2007 lucy wrote:
No Avatar Available

thank you for posting the pictures and not being cowed by steve and barrys lawyers. i believe the pics should stand for themselves.
i think the line is garbage. it looks like something a kid wouldnt want to wear after wearing it once.
and no one is going to believe that SJP “designed” 500+ items.
howevr i disagree with kathryn finneys assesment that the line is in any sense of the word “fashion forward”.

Comments

March 27, 2007 Alex wrote:
No Avatar Available

Ick.  So disappointed and not impressed.  She couldn’t have possibbly designed this stuff.  Even without a sytlist she’s bound to be better than this on her own.

Comments

March 27, 2007 Anne wrote:
No Avatar Available

Lame, boring, and WTF is up with the belt under the boobs?!  And wide legged white drawstring pants don’t look good on anyone, even SJP!  BLEAH!  I won’t be buying any of this.  Cathy, above, is right - looks like Gap circa 1999 and I haven’t been impressed with them since then, either!

Comments

March 27, 2007 Ivi wrote:
No Avatar Available

Very common designs, another version of Old Navy stuff or the GAP (you’re absolutely right), very very disapointing...I think stars should focus on their acting and leave the designing to those that have a talent and a vision.

Comments

March 27, 2007 SRS wrote:
No Avatar Available

I don’t think we have a Steve & Barry’s, I just moved across country, but I’ve never heard of the store either way.  I wouldn’t buy any of this unless the quality was great, and it sounds like that won’t be the case.  I’d rather do the hunt and gather thing and buy a better brand on sale; quality basics never go out of style, but cheap basics...well, what’s the point?  Trendy stuff is where one should save their money, I think.  And I’m not at all basic in my style, I am much more like Carrie from SATC!

Comments

March 27, 2007 Fiona wrote:
No Avatar Available

Very boring and no different to a dozen other high street stores, including the GAP. Having said that, I’ve not thought much of SJP’s style anyway, not since she left Sex and the City.

Page 1 of 2 pages  1 2 >